La Base de Datos

Este navegador recopila 65 extractos de decisiones públicas publicadas por la CCF, que abarcan desde 2017 hasta 2025. Las decisiones seleccionadas están anotadas con análisis jurídico por Charlie Magri, fundador de Otherside.

Busque por palabra clave, filtre por tipo de dato o fundamento jurídico, explore por tema.

Fundamentos Jurídicos Clave

Los motivos más frecuentemente invocados incluyen el Artículo 3 (prohibición de intervención política), el Artículo 2 (derechos humanos) y el Artículo 83 RPD (condiciones de la Notificación Roja).

Otros motivos recurrentes: juicio justo, estatuto de refugiado, ne bis in idem y asuntos familiares.

Acerca de Otherside

Otherside se especializa exclusivamente en asuntos de INTERPOL y la CCF, incluyendo la eliminación de Notificaciones Rojas, la supresión de difusiones y las medidas provisionales urgentes.

Conozca El bufete El fundador Resultados de casos En la prensa Honorarios

Herramienta complementaria

También puede consultar nuestra herramienta gratuita de motivos de supresión de INTERPOL.

Si desea saber cuáles de estos motivos pueden aplicarse a su situación particular, la herramienta realiza una autoevaluación guiada basada en las mismas sesenta y cinco decisiones indexadas anteriormente. Se le enviará un informe escrito a su bandeja de entrada.

Pruebe la evaluación
3 Minutos para completar
17 Motivos analizados
65 Decisiones de la CCF indexadas

Published CCF Decision Excerpts

0 decisions

CCF Decisions by Legal Topic

01

Political Motivation — Art. 3

The CCF applies a predominance test. Political motivation must predominate over legitimate criminal justice purposes. General country reports are insufficient — specific individualised evidence is required.

02

Commercial Disputes — Art. 83 RPD

Under Art. 83(1)(a)(i) RPD, Red Notices may not be published for offences deriving from private disputes or administrative violations. The CCF requires the NCB to demonstrate sufficient facts linking the individual to criminal conduct, and that the case does not constitute a private or commercial dispute dressed as a criminal offence.

03

NCB Non-Response

Where the NCB fails to respond to the Commission’s queries despite reminders, the lack of answer creates serious doubts as to compliance with INTERPOL’s rules. The Commission may delete or block the data without ruling on the merits of the underlying case.

04

Parental Custody — Family Matters

Red Notices cannot circumvent cross-border custody disputes where conflicting rulings exist in two member countries. Yellow Notices may stand where movement risk persists, but are deleted where precise location and custody are both confirmed.

05

Human Rights — Art. 2

Article 2(1) requires INTERPOL to act “in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” The CCF examines whether extradition would expose the individual to torture, death penalty, or a flagrant denial of fair trial, relying in particular on national court decisions denying extradition on human rights grounds.

06

Refugee Status

For former refugees who later obtained citizenship in a host country, the non-refoulement principle — a customary norm of international law — may still apply. The CCF assesses whether the situation that initially justified the protective status has substantially changed; if not, data from the country of origin are generally found non-compliant.

Otherside — INTERPOL Law Practice

Subject to a Red Notice
or INTERPOL diffusion?

Otherside specialises exclusively in INTERPOL and CCF matters. Founded by Charlie Magri, a lawyer who served six years as a Legal Officer within the CCF itself — the same body that decides on deletion requests.

© 2026 Otherside. The compilation, structure, and legal commentary of the CCF Decision Navigator are protected by copyright. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.