La base de données

Cette base réunit 65 extraits de décisions publiés par la CCF, de 2017 à 2025. Certaines décisions sont accompagnées d'une analyse juridique de Charlie Magri, fondateur d'Otherside.

Recherchez par mot-clé, filtrez par type de données ou par fondement juridique, ou parcourez les décisions par thème.

Principaux fondements juridiques

Les fondements les plus souvent invoqués sont l'article 3 du Statut d'INTERPOL (interdiction de toute intervention à caractère politique), l'article 2 (droits de l'Homme) et l'article 83 du RTD (conditions de publication d'une notice rouge).

Autres fondements récurrents : procès équitable, statut de réfugié, ne bis in idem et litiges familiaux.

À propos d’Otherside

Otherside se consacre exclusivement aux dossiers INTERPOL et CCF, notamment la suppression de notices rouges et de diffusions, ainsi que les demandes de mesures provisoires urgentes.

Découvrir Le cabinet Le fondateur Résultats obtenus Dans la presse Honoraires

Outil complémentaire

Vous pouvez aussi utiliser notre Diagnostic Notice INTERPOL gratuit.

Pour savoir lesquels de ces fondements peuvent concerner votre situation, l'outil propose une auto-évaluation guidée, fondée sur les 65 extraits de décisions indexés ci-dessus. Un rapport écrit vous est envoyé par e-mail.

Lancer le diagnostic
3 minutes pour le remplir
17 motifs analysés
65 décisions de la CCF indexées

Published CCF Decision Excerpts

0 decisions

CCF Decisions by Legal Topic

01

Political Motivation — Art. 3

The CCF applies a predominance test. Political motivation must predominate over legitimate criminal justice purposes. General country reports are insufficient — specific individualised evidence is required.

02

Commercial Disputes — Art. 83 RPD

Under Art. 83(1)(a)(i) RPD, Red Notices may not be published for offences deriving from private disputes or administrative violations. The CCF requires the NCB to demonstrate sufficient facts linking the individual to criminal conduct, and that the case does not constitute a private or commercial dispute dressed as a criminal offence.

03

NCB Non-Response

Where the NCB fails to respond to the Commission’s queries despite reminders, the lack of answer creates serious doubts as to compliance with INTERPOL’s rules. The Commission may delete or block the data without ruling on the merits of the underlying case.

04

Parental Custody — Family Matters

Red Notices cannot circumvent cross-border custody disputes where conflicting rulings exist in two member countries. Yellow Notices may stand where movement risk persists, but are deleted where precise location and custody are both confirmed.

05

Human Rights — Art. 2

Article 2(1) requires INTERPOL to act “in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” The CCF examines whether extradition would expose the individual to torture, death penalty, or a flagrant denial of fair trial, relying in particular on national court decisions denying extradition on human rights grounds.

06

Refugee Status

For former refugees who later obtained citizenship in a host country, the non-refoulement principle — a customary norm of international law — may still apply. The CCF assesses whether the situation that initially justified the protective status has substantially changed; if not, data from the country of origin are generally found non-compliant.

Otherside — INTERPOL Law Practice

Subject to a Red Notice
or INTERPOL diffusion?

Otherside specialises exclusively in INTERPOL and CCF matters. Founded by Charlie Magri, a lawyer who served six years as a Legal Officer within the CCF itself — the same body that decides on deletion requests.

© 2026 Otherside. The compilation, structure, and legal commentary of the CCF Decision Navigator are protected by copyright. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.