Il Database

Questo navigatore raccoglie 65 estratti di decisioni pubbliche pubblicate dalla CCF, che coprono il periodo dal 2017 al 2025. Le decisioni selezionate sono annotate con analisi legale di Charlie Magri, fondatore di Otherside.

Cerca per parola chiave, filtra per tipo di dato o base giuridica, naviga per argomento.

Principali Basi Legali

I motivi più frequentemente invocati includono l'Articolo 3 (divieto di intervento politico), l'Articolo 2 (diritti umani) e l'Articolo 83 RPD (condizioni della Notifica Rossa).

Altri motivi ricorrenti: equo processo, status di rifugiato, ne bis in idem e questioni familiari.

Informazioni su Otherside

Otherside è specializzata esclusivamente in questioni INTERPOL e CCF, inclusa la rimozione di Notifiche Rosse, la cancellazione di diffusioni e le misure provvisorie urgenti.

Scopri Lo studio Il fondatore Risultati dei casi Sulla stampa Tariffe

Strumento complementare

Puoi anche consultare il nostro strumento gratuito per i motivi di cancellazione INTERPOL.

Se desideri sapere quali di questi motivi potrebbero applicarsi alla tua situazione, lo strumento esegue un'autovalutazione guidata basata sulle stesse sessantacinque decisioni indicizzate sopra. Un rapporto scritto viene consegnato alla tua casella di posta.

Prova la valutazione
3 Minuti per completare
17 Motivi esaminati
65 Decisioni CCF indicizzate

Published CCF Decision Excerpts

0 decisions

CCF Decisions by Legal Topic

01

Political Motivation — Art. 3

The CCF applies a predominance test. Political motivation must predominate over legitimate criminal justice purposes. General country reports are insufficient — specific individualised evidence is required.

02

Commercial Disputes — Art. 83 RPD

Under Art. 83(1)(a)(i) RPD, Red Notices may not be published for offences deriving from private disputes or administrative violations. The CCF requires the NCB to demonstrate sufficient facts linking the individual to criminal conduct, and that the case does not constitute a private or commercial dispute dressed as a criminal offence.

03

NCB Non-Response

Where the NCB fails to respond to the Commission’s queries despite reminders, the lack of answer creates serious doubts as to compliance with INTERPOL’s rules. The Commission may delete or block the data without ruling on the merits of the underlying case.

04

Parental Custody — Family Matters

Red Notices cannot circumvent cross-border custody disputes where conflicting rulings exist in two member countries. Yellow Notices may stand where movement risk persists, but are deleted where precise location and custody are both confirmed.

05

Human Rights — Art. 2

Article 2(1) requires INTERPOL to act “in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” The CCF examines whether extradition would expose the individual to torture, death penalty, or a flagrant denial of fair trial, relying in particular on national court decisions denying extradition on human rights grounds.

06

Refugee Status

For former refugees who later obtained citizenship in a host country, the non-refoulement principle — a customary norm of international law — may still apply. The CCF assesses whether the situation that initially justified the protective status has substantially changed; if not, data from the country of origin are generally found non-compliant.

Otherside — INTERPOL Law Practice

Subject to a Red Notice
or INTERPOL diffusion?

Otherside specialises exclusively in INTERPOL and CCF matters. Founded by Charlie Magri, a lawyer who served six years as a Legal Officer within the CCF itself — the same body that decides on deletion requests.

© 2026 Otherside. The compilation, structure, and legal commentary of the CCF Decision Navigator are protected by copyright. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.