INTERPOLLegal Services
Full-lifecycle representation before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files, handled directly by a former CCF Legal Officer with six years inside the Commission.
The practice covers the full procedural range: Red Notice removal, challenges to diffusions, urgent temporary blocking, data access requests, preemptive requests, and applications for revision under Article 42 of the CCF Statute.
Each engagement is informed by first-hand knowledge of how requests are read, weighed, and decided in practice. That background shapes how grounds are framed, which evidence carries weight, and how submissions are sequenced for the CCF.
About the founderRepresentation Across the Full CCF Lifecycle
INTERPOL cases unfold across distinct procedural moments. The right legal step depends on whether a Notice has been published, when, and on what evidentiary basis. The phases below cover the standard sequence and the procedural tools available at each stage before the CCF.
Preemptive Request
Where there are credible indicators that a future Red Notice or Diffusion may be sought, an INTERPOL preemptive request documents the compliance concerns with the CCF before any data is published. The aim is to influence the General Secretariat's review of the request from the outset.
Data Access Request
Where it is unclear whether INTERPOL holds personal data, an INTERPOL data access request obtains the CCF's official response. Confirmation of the existence of any record is the necessary first step before any deletion strategy can be set.
Red Notice Removal
When a Notice or Diffusion is in INTERPOL's files, the core remedy is a deletion request. Red Notice removal proceeds through written submissions to the CCF, organised around the strongest available grounds under Articles 2 and 3 of INTERPOL's Constitution and the Rules on the Processing of Data.
Temporary Blocking
Where the practical effects of a Red Notice create immediate risk and irreparable harm, an application for temporary blocking under Article 37 of the CCF Statute can suspend the Notice while the deletion request is examined. The blocking application travels alongside the main file.
Application for Revision
Where a prior CCF decision did not order deletion and new, relevant facts have since emerged, an application for revision under Article 42 of the CCF Statute can re-open the file. Revision is exceptional and admissibility is tightly defined.
What We Handle Before the CCF
Six procedural lines of work, each handled directly by a former CCF Legal Officer. The right tool depends on whether a Notice is in INTERPOL's files, whether immediate protection is required, and whether the file has previously been examined.
INTERPOL Red Notice Removal
The core remedy. Written submissions to the CCF to delete a Red Notice or Diffusion that breaches Articles 2 or 3 of INTERPOL's Constitution, or the Rules on the Processing of Data. Each file is built around the strongest available grounds, with a clean factual record and an indexed evidentiary appendix.
Learn More About Red Notice RemovalTemporary Blocking of Red Notices
An emergency procedure. Article 37 of the CCF Statute permits the suspension of a Red Notice while the deletion request is examined, where there is immediate risk and irreparable harm. Filed alongside the main file, the blocking application sets out the practical effects of the Notice that warrant urgent action.
Discover How to Request Temporary BlockingINTERPOL Data Access Requests
Confirmation of whether personal data are recorded in INTERPOL's systems and the CCF's official response. The response is the necessary first step before any deletion strategy can be set, and it fixes a procedural baseline against which subsequent steps can be measured.
Read About INTERPOL Data Access RequestsINTERPOL Preemptive Requests
A submission to INTERPOL before any Notice is processed. The aim is to document compliance concerns in advance, particularly Article 3 predominance, Article 2 risks, or quality of data issues, so that any future Notice request is reviewed against the recorded position.
Learn How Preemptive Requests WorkApplications for Revision
A second look at a closed file. Article 42 of the CCF Statute permits a request for re-examination of a prior CCF decision where new, relevant facts have emerged that were not available at the time of the original review. Submissions begin with a two-page summary.
Find Out About Applications for RevisionLegal Support for Law Firms
Specialist counsel for referring firms handling CCF matters. Three engagement models: consultancy, drafting of CCF applications, or review of existing drafts. Collaboration is confidential, conflict-cleared in advance, and confined to INTERPOL and the CCF.
Explore Legal Support for Law FirmsWhich Procedure Fits Your Situation
Click a scenario on the left to surface the matching service. Each procedural tool fits a specific moment in the lifecycle of an INTERPOL case.
Red Notice Removal, with Temporary Blocking If Urgent
The core remedy is a deletion request: Red Notice removal, organised around the strongest available grounds under Articles 2 and 3 of INTERPOL's Constitution. Where the practical effects of the Notice create immediate risk and irreparable harm, an application for temporary blocking under Article 37 of the CCF Statute can be filed alongside the main file.
Go to Red Notice RemovalINTERPOL Data Access Request
The first step is an INTERPOL data access request. The CCF's response sets the procedural baseline: it confirms whether a record exists, communicates extracts where applicable, and identifies any restriction imposed by the National Central Bureau. Restrictions are addressed within the same channel.
Go to Data Access RequestsINTERPOL Preemptive Request
Where the risk is concrete and documentable, an INTERPOL preemptive request documents the compliance concerns with the CCF before any data is published. The aim is to inform the General Secretariat's review of any future Notice request from the outset, particularly on Article 3 predominance and Article 2 risks.
Go to Preemptive RequestsApplication for Revision
Where new, relevant facts were not available at the time of the original review, an application for revision under Article 42 of the CCF Statute can re-open the file. Admissibility is tightly defined; submissions begin with a two-page summary, with the full file following only if the CCF requests it.
Go to Applications for RevisionLegal Support for Law Firms
Engagement runs in one of three models: consultancy, drafting of the CCF application from the ground up, or review of an existing draft before filing. Collaboration is confidential, conflict-cleared in advance, and confined to INTERPOL and the CCF.
Go to Law Firm SupportBuilt on Prior Experience Within the CCF
A boutique INTERPOL-only practice founded by a former CCF Legal Officer with six years inside the Commission. Files are scoped, framed, and sequenced for the way the Requests Chamber actually decides cases.
Facing an INTERPOL notice?
Otherside represents individuals and companies before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files, challenging Red Notices, diffusions, and other data in INTERPOL's files. A free 30-minute Zoom consultation is offered where the firm's criteria for representation are met.