Skip to main content

INTERPOL Lawyer | Red Notice Removal

About Otherside – INTERPOL Lawyer and Red Notice Removal Expert

Otherside is a law firm specializing in challenging INTERPOL notices including Red Notice removal, founded by an experienced INTERPOL lawyer who served  six years as a Legal Officer at the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF)—the body responsible for processing requests to delete data from INTERPOL’s files.

This expertise is now channeled into offering specialized services to address the complexities of INTERPOL’s procedures.

Otherside’s approach combines this in-depth expertise with a strong commitment to justice, ensuring that individuals facing unjust INTERPOL notices and diffusions receive tailored assistance.

Our Services

INTERPOL Red Notice Removal

We specialize in INTERPOL Red Notice removal and the deletion of INTERPOL diffusions by submitting well-prepared requests before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF). Each case is analyzed for possible rule violations to ensure the strongest possible challenge. Through tailored legal strategies, we contest these notices to defend our clients’ rights.

01

INTERPOL Data Access Requests

We assist individuals in submitting INTERPOL data access requests before the CCF to determine whether personal information is recorded in INTERPOL’s Information System. Our expertise ensures procedural compliance and mitigates the restrictive measures often imposed by National Central Bureaus (NCBs).

02

Temporary Blocking of Red Notice

We represent clients seeking temporary blocking of Red Notices through emergency provisional measures before the CCF. These requests suspend international police cooperation and prevent access to data while the deletion procedure is under review, providing immediate protection against the effects of a Red Notice.

03

Preemptive Requests before INTERPOL

We advise on preventive measures before INTERPOL, including preemptive requests that help stop the publication of a future Red Notice. This proactive approach uses our deep understanding of INTERPOL’s pre-publication review to reduce the risk of abusive or politically motivated alerts.

04

Applications for Revision

Our services also cover the preparation of applications for revision of CCF decisions. We provide guidance on meeting the eligibility conditions set forth in Article 42 of the CCF Statute, including the integration of newly discovered and pertinent facts into the application.

05

INTERPOL Legal Support for Law Firms

We provide specialized INTERPOL legal support for law firms managing Red Notice removal or CCF applications. Through confidential consultancy and subcontracted drafting, we assist firms handling complex INTERPOL matters requiring technical expertise.

06
INTERPOL Lawyer Charlie Magri

Founder of Otherside, Charlie Magri is a French lawyer admitted to the Marseille Bar, France, with extensive experience in INTERPOL law and Red Notice removal. Before establishing Otherside, he served for six years as a Legal Officer at the Secretariat to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) — the independent body responsible for reviewing and deciding on requests for access to, correction, and deletion of data held in INTERPOL’s files.

His work within the CCF provided unique insight into INTERPOL’s procedures and Red Notice removal. This experience forms the foundation of his practice as an INTERPOL lawyer, representing clients worldwide in Red Notice challenges and proceedings before the CCF. At Otherside, he delivers precise, confidential representation in all matters involving INTERPOL.

Charlie Magri is a member of the European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA) and the International Bar Association (IBA).

Learn About INTERPOL

As a central organization in international law enforcement across 196 member countries, INTERPOL plays a critical role. Nonetheless, its influence and methods have prompted discussions, especially regarding the balance between fostering international police cooperation and ensuring robust safeguards to protect individual rights. Understanding INTERPOL’s rules is critical when challenging an unjust Red Notice or seeking data deletion from INTERPOL’s files.

INTERPOL's Legal Framework

  • INTERPOL’s Constitution establishes the fundamental rules and principles by which the Organization operates. It defines the structure and roles of each INTERPOL body together with the Organization’s mandate which is primarily to ensure and promote the widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities, respecting the laws of different countries and the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, among other goals. It sets an expectation for INTERPOL to maintain neutrality, clearly avoiding any activities that are political, military, religious, or racial.
  • The Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD) govern all data processing in the INTERPOL Information System, including that surrounding the publication and circulation of Red Notices. The RPD cover various aspects of data processing, including data collection, storage, access, and dissemination among INTERPOL member countries. The Rules underscore the criticality of ensuring the accuracy, relevance, and safety of the data processed in INTERPOL’s Files.

The Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files (CCF)

  • The Commission is an independent body, responsible for ensuring that the processing of personal data by INTERPOL complies with the applicable INTERPOL rules. The CCF has a supervisory and an advisory role, and it is responsible for processing requests for access to,  and/or deletion of data processed in INTERPOL’s files.
  • The CCF is composed of two chambers:
    • The Supervisory and Advisory Chamber provides the Organization with advice about any project, operation, set of rules or other matter involving the processing of personal data in the INTERPOL Information System;
    • The Requests Chamber has the power to examine and decide on individual requests for access to, or correction and/or deletion of data processed in the INTERPOL Information System. It is also empowered to consider applications for revision of its previous decisions.

Types of INTERPOL Notices

Expertise in Red Notice Removal and CCF Proceedings

At Otherside, we specialize in INTERPOL Red Notice removal, assisting clients through every stage of proceedings before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF).

Led by a former CCF Legal Officer, our firm combines institutional insight with precise legal strategy to challenge Red Notices and other data recorded in INTERPOL’s files.

Each request is prepared with meticulous attention to CCF procedure and supported by detailed analysis of INTERPOL’s legal framework and case law.

Our personalized approach ensures that every case reflects the client’s specific circumstances while aligning with the Commission’s established decision-making practice.

 

Challenging INTERPOL Notices and Diffusions

Building on our experience before the CCF, we assist clients in contesting INTERPOL notices and diffusions that breach INTERPOL’s rules or affect fundamental rights. Our work is grounded in a deep understanding of CCF jurisprudence, enabling us to anticipate procedural expectations and develop targeted legal strategies for each case.

Case evaluation and legal analysis

Our first step is a detailed review of your situation — assessing the INTERPOL notice, underlying charges, and any potential breaches of INTERPOL’s rules or Constitution. When access to information is restricted, we conduct an in-depth analysis of all available material to build the most effective strategy. Drawing on our understanding of the Rules on the Processing of Data (RPD) and CCF jurisprudence, we identify the strongest legal arguments to support Red Notice removal or data deletion.

Evidence Collection and Request Preparation

We gather and structure supporting documents, including judicial decisions, procedural records, or evidence of political or abusive motives, ensuring the request meets all CCF admissibility requirements. Each submission is written to align with the Commission’s procedural standards and supported by relevant case law.

Representation Before INTERPOL and the CCF

As your legal representative, we manage all communications with INTERPOL and the CCF, ensuring your case is properly presented throughout the process. We monitor the progress of your request, maintain compliance with established timelines, and provide updates on developments and next steps. Our firm’s experience ensures a clear, strategic, and legally sound approach to every INTERPOL challenge.

Misuses of INTERPOL's Channels

In several cases, concerns have emerged regarding the use of INTERPOL channels for reasons beyond justice, notably for political purposes, which have led to important human rights considerations. Our firm is committed to tackling these challenges.

Political Cases

The practice of some member countries utilizing Red Notices for political aims, instead of legitimate criminal justice purposes, has been a persistent problem. This misuse often targets political opponents, dissidents, and activists, effectively internationalizing domestic political disputes in direct violation of Article 3 of INTERPOL’s Constitution, which strictly forbids any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious, or racial character.

Impact on Human Rights

Individuals impacted by misuse of INTERPOL’s channels may face unjust detention and complex legal battles, adversely affecting their freedom of movement, reputation, and rights to a fair trial and presumption of innocence. Furthermore, the risks of arbitrary detention, along with the possibility of torture or inhumane treatment in some jurisdictions, significantly amplify the violation of individual rights.

It is strictly forbidden for the Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.

Article 3INTERPOL's Constitution
Legal insights on the misuse of INTERPOL channels
INTERPOL lawyer Charlie Magri

Addressing Misuses

At Otherside, we specialize in addressing and contesting such misuses of INTERPOL's channels.
Our expertise lies in handling the complexities of these cases, advocating for the rights of those unjustly targeted, and challenging wrongful Red Notices.

How to Challenge INTERPOL Notices

An unjust INTERPOL Notice can severely impact your freedom of movement, reputation, and legal status. Whether you are facing a Red Notice, Blue Notice, Yellow Notice, or Green Notice, understanding how to challenge and remove these alerts is essential. We specialize in assisting individuals targeted by the misuse of INTERPOL’s system.

FAQs on INTERPOL

What is an INTERPOL Red Notice?

Red Notices are issued by the General Secretariat at the request of a member country’s INTERPOL National Central Bureau and are made available for all member countries. This notice is grounded in a valid arrest warrant or judicial decision from the requesting country’s legal authorities. While Red Notices act as global alerts, they do not mandate arrest by member countries, leaving the decision to local law enforcement.

Can INTERPOL arrest individuals under a Red Notice?

INTERPOL itself does not have the authority to arrest individuals. It facilitates international police cooperation by issuing notices like Red Notices. The decision to arrest is made by law enforcement agencies in member countries based on their national laws and the details of the Red Notice.

How can INTERPOL notices be challenged?

INTERPOL notices can be challenged through the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF). The process involves submitting a request to the CCF, which then reviews the notice for compliance with INTERPOL’s rules. Legal representation can be crucial in effectively presenting a case to the CCF.

What is the CCF and How Can It Help with Red Notice Removal?

The CCF operates as an autonomous and impartial entity within INTERPOL, tasked with ensuring that the processing of personal data aligns with INTERPOL’s rules and international legal standards. The CCF’s mandate is detailed in its Statute, Operating Rules, and the overarching legal framework of INTERPOL, which includes the organization’s Constitution. It is structured into two main chambers: one for supervisory and advisory functions and another for handling requests related to data access or deletion in the INTERPOL Information System, as well as reviewing applications for revisions.

How does the CCF ensure independence and impartiality?

The CCF maintains its independence and impartiality by operating separately from INTERPOL’s main organizational entities. Its members, elected by the General Assembly for their expertise in international law, data protection, and human rights, contribute in their individual capacities, not as country representatives. This distinction ensures an unbiased approach to data review. Operational rules set in March 2017 and updated in February 2019 mitigate conflict of interest, demanding withdrawal in direct conflict scenarios and the signing of declarations affirming neutrality.

What types of requests can individuals submit to the CCF?

Individuals have the right to submit the following types of requests to the CCF:

  • Access requests: Seeking information on personal data held in INTERPOL’s databases.
  • Deletion requests: Asking for the removal of their data recorded in INTERPOL’s files.
  • Applications for revisions: Requesting a review of CCF’s previous decisions based on new, relevant facts that were not available during the initial review.

Can I find out if I am subject to an INTERPOL Red Notice?

The majority of Red Notices are restricted to law enforcement use only. Extracts of Red Notices are published on the INTERPOL’s public website at the request of the member country concerned and where the public’s help may be needed to locate an individual or if the individual may pose a threat to public safety. Individuals can request information from INTERPOL to find out if they are subject to a Red Notice. This can be done by submitting a request to the CCF.

How does a Red Notice affect extradition?

A Red Notice is not an international arrest warrant, but it can lead to extradition if the country where the individual is located agrees to extradite based on its own laws and the extradition treaty with the requesting country.

What are the grounds for deleting an INTERPOL Notice?

An INTERPOL notice may be deleted for various reasons, among them:
  • Issuance for political, military, religious, or racial reasons, against the principles of Article 3 of INTERPOL’s Constitution.
  • Violations of human rights, contravening Article 2 of INTERPOL’s Constitution.
  • Non-compliance with the legal issuance criteria specified in the INTERPOL’s Rules on the Processing of Data.

These are common examples of grounds for deletion reviewed by the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files.

What are the timeframes for decisions on requests by the CCF?

  • Access to data: The Requests Chamber must decide on a request for access to data within four months from the date the request is declared admissible.
  • Correction/deletion of data: For requests regarding the correction and/or deletion of data, the decision must be made within nine months from when the request is deemed admissible.
  • Extensions: If necessary, the Requests Chamber can extend these timeframes based on the specific circumstances of a request.

Can our CCF experience influence decisions?

While the founder’s prior professional experience within the CCF grants a unique expertise and understanding of the CCF’s jurisprudence and its decision-making process, it in no way bestows any power to influence the CCF’s Secretariat and/or the CCF members, nor the decisions they make. Due to the confidentiality and professional secrecy from the founder’s previous role, we cannot disclose any case-specific or other confidential/sensitive information acquired through or related to the founder’s duties at the Commission. Adhering to rigorous ethical standards, our firm abstains from engaging with cases the founder directly handled at the CCF and avoids any situations where previously acquired knowledge could pose ethical conflicts.

FAQs on INTERPOL and Red Notice removal

Need Help With INTERPOL Red Notice Removal or Challenging Unjust Notices?

Email us to present your situation, and let's begin moving towards a solution with dedicated legal guidance.

Recent INTERPOL News & Articles

The CCF Statute Under Review: A Timely Opportunity for Civil Society
CCF statute under review
The CCF Statute Under Review: A Timely Opportunity for Civil Society

The CCF Statute Under Review: A Timely Opportunity for Civil Society

The Committee on the Processing of Data (CPD)—a standing body of INTERPOL’s General Assembly—has launched…
23 September 2025 Read More
Charlie Magri Quoted in RTBF Coverage of Upcoming INTERPOL Documentary
Charlie Magri Quoted in RTBF Coverage of Upcoming INTERPOL Documentary

Charlie Magri Quoted in RTBF Coverage of Upcoming INTERPOL Documentary

RTBF has published an article previewing the upcoming documentary Notices rouges: la face cachée d’Interpol,…
7 September 2025 Read More