INTERPOL Revision Request

Our Services: INTERPOL Revision Requests

A revision request allows an individual to ask the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) to reconsider a previous decision when new information has emerged.

This procedure under Article 42 of the CCF Statute is exceptional and applies only where a new fact could have led the CCF to reach a different conclusion in its earlier review.

At Otherside, we assist clients in preparing and submitting INTERPOL revision requests that meet the CCF’s strict admissibility and procedural requirements.

Legal Framework Applicable to INTERPOL Revision Requests

A revision request before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) is the only procedure that allows a person to seek re-examination of a previous CCF decision.

It is governed by Article 42 of the CCF Statute, which sets strict admissibility conditions for any INTERPOL revision request.

A request is admissible only when all three requirements are met:

(i) It is based on the discovery of a new fact;

(ii) That fact could have led the CCF to a different conclusion had it been known during the original examination; and

(iii) The request is submitted within six months of discovering the new fact.

A revision request is not an appeal. It is a limited procedural remedy that safeguards fairness while maintaining the finality of CCF decisions.

INTERPOL revision request under Article 42 before the CCF

When a Revision Request May Be Filed

A revision request before the CCF may be filed only when new information arises after the Commission’s decision. The purpose of this procedure is to allow the re-examination of a CCF decision that could have reached a different conclusion had the new fact been known earlier. The main circumstances that may justify submitting an INTERPOL revision request under Article 42 of the CCF Statute include the following:

Discovery of a New Fact

The request must be based on the discovery of a new fact that existed at the time of the original review but was unknown to the applicant.

It must be significant enough that, if it had been presented earlier, the CCF might have reached a different conclusion.

Material Impact on the Original Decision

The newly discovered element must be capable of changing the outcome of the previous proceedings.

Evidence that merely clarifies or supports arguments already examined by the CCF will not meet this requirement.

Compliance with the Six-Month Time Limit

Under Article 42(2), the application must be submitted within six months from the date the new fact was discovered.

The Commission applies this rule strictly to ensure procedural certainty and consistency across all revision requests.

Exceptional Nature of the Remedy

A revision request is not a second review or an appeal.

It is a narrow procedural mechanism reserved for exceptional cases where new evidence fundamentally alters the basis of the prior decision.

Our Approach

At Otherside, we manage each INTERPOL revision request in accordance with Article 42 of the CCF Statute, ensuring that every submission meets the strict admissibility standards applied by the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF).

Our process combines legal accuracy with a detailed understanding of how the Commission assesses new facts and procedural compliance.

Assessment of the New Fact

We begin by analysing the material presented to determine whether it qualifies as a new fact under Article 42. This step establishes whether the information was genuinely unknown during the original proceedings and whether it could influence the prior decision.

Preparation of the Revision Request

Once the new fact is verified, we prepare the revision request in full compliance with the CCF’s procedural requirements. The submission sets out the factual background, demonstrates the materiality of the new element, and confirms compliance with the six-month filing deadline.

Submission to the CCF

We lodge the application directly before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files, following the official format and communication protocols used by the Requests Chamber. This ensures that the request is formally registered and ready for examination.

Review and Follow-Up

After submission, we monitor the case to confirm that it proceeds within the timeframe provided by Article 40 of the CCF Statute. We analyse any correspondence issued by the CCF and advise on possible next steps depending on the Commission’s determination.

Why Choose Otherside

At Otherside, we act exclusively before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files. Our work on INTERPOL revision requests reflects a precise understanding of how the CCF applies Article 42 and evaluates newly discovered facts.

Specialised Focus on CCF Proceedings

We handle only matters arising before the CCF, allowing us to apply a detailed procedural approach tailored to INTERPOL’s internal mechanisms. Each revision request is drafted to meet the Commission’s exact formal and evidentiary standards.

Experience with Article 42 Applications

Our experience with revision procedures enables us to identify which new elements are likely to meet the CCF’s definition of a “new fact.” We ensure that each application demonstrates clear materiality and respects the strict six-month deadline under Article 42.

Analytical Precision

We analyse both the CCF’s prior decision and the newly presented material to determine how the new fact could alter the Commission’s conclusions. This approach allows us to frame the submission in a way that aligns with the CCF’s established reasoning and case practice.

Continuity and Follow-Up

When the CCF admits a revision request, we continue to advise the client throughout the renewed proceedings. We interpret the Commission’s correspondence, monitor procedural developments, and ensure that the revised review remains consistent with INTERPOL’s rules.

Contact an INTERPOL Lawyer for Revision Requests

If you have received a decision from the CCF and have since discovered new information that may affect its findings, you may be eligible to submit a revision request under Article 42 of the CCF Statute. This procedure allows the CCF to reconsider its previous decision only when a new fact could have led to a different outcome. We assist clients in assessing the admissibility of INTERPOL revision requests, preparing the necessary documentation, and presenting the case before the CCF with full respect for confidentiality. For an initial consultation or to discuss the discovery of new material relevant to your case, contact Otherside.