Our Services
Requests for Access
Individuals have the right to submit an INTERPOL data access request to determine whether their personal data is recorded in INTERPOL’s files.
At Otherside, we assist clients in exercising this right by submitting requests for access to the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) — the independent body within INTERPOL responsible for reviewing individual data requests.
Our experience within INTERPOL allows us to prepare accurate and complete applications, ensuring that clients receive the information necessary to understand or challenge any measures based on INTERPOL data.
How an INTERPOL Data Access Request Works
A request for access is examined by the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF). The procedure is written, confidential, and follows a defined sequence from registration to decision.
01
Submission of the Request
We prepare and submit the request for access before the CCF on behalf of the individual concerned.
The application must be written in one of INTERPOL’s official languages, signed, and accompanied by a valid identity document and, where applicable, a power of attorney.
A request for access is not required to be motivated; it is a formal step to determine whether personal data exist in the INTERPOL Information System (IIS).
Applicants are strongly encouraged to indicate a specific source of data—for example, the National Central Bureau (NCB) or other entity that may have processed information through INTERPOL’s channels—to help the CCF identify relevant records efficiently.
02
Consultation of the National Central Bureau (NCB)
Once the request is declared admissible, the CCF consults the National Central Bureau (NCB) that supplied the data before disclosing any information to the applicant.
Under Article 35 of the CCF Statute, the NCB may request restrictions on communication when necessary to protect public or national security, maintain the confidentiality of an investigation or prosecution, or safeguard the rights and freedoms of the applicant or third parties.
Any restriction must be specifically justified. The CCF examines each request closely and routinely reminds NCBs that broad or unsupported justifications do not meet the standards set out in Articles 35(3) and 35(4).
03
Timeframe for Decision
According to Article 40(1) of the CCF Statute, the Requests Chamber must decide on a request for access within four months from the date on which it is declared admissible.
Extensions are permitted only in exceptional cases and must be reasonable, motivated, and promptly communicated to the parties.
We monitor each case to ensure compliance with this statutory timeframe and to address delays caused by NCB consultations or restrictions.
04
Communication of the Response
At the conclusion of its review, the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) provides a formal response to the applicant.
Where data concerning the applicant are recorded in the INTERPOL Information System (IIS), the CCF confirms their existence and, when authorised, communicates the details of the data recorded in INTERPOL’s files.
When restrictions are requested by the National Central Bureau (NCB) or another source of data, the Commission limits communication in accordance with its confidentiality obligations under Article 35(1) of the CCF Statute.
Our Approach
Proceedings before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) require accuracy, discretion, and a clear understanding of how the organisation applies its rules.
We handle every INTERPOL data access request with precision, ensuring that the submission meets admissibility standards and CCF procedural requirements.
We ensure that every request is admissible, properly filed, and complete, allowing the Commission to identify the relevant data without delay.
Throughout the review, we monitor correspondence and timeframes under Article 40 to confirm that the procedure remains on track.
Once the CCF issues its response, we analyse its language — including restricted communications — to determine whether further steps, such as a request for deletion, may be appropriate.
Why Choose Otherside
At Otherside, we act exclusively in matters before the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF). Our experience within INTERPOL and our understanding of its internal procedures ensure precise, informed, and confidential representation in all requests for access and related proceedings.
Specialised Expertise
We focus exclusively on proceedings before the CCF. This concentration allows us to manage access requests efficiently and in full conformity with the Commission’s procedural and confidentiality framework. We understand how the CCF interprets its Statute, applies restrictions, and weighs the balance between individual rights and international police cooperation.
Addressing Restrictions
We carefully examine any restrictions requested by National Central Bureaus (NCBs) in light of the CCF’s jurisprudence on necessity, proportionality, and justification. When restrictions appear excessive or insufficiently motivated, we submit targeted observations to the Commission to safeguard the applicant’s right of access.
Analysis of the CCF Response
Once the CCF provides its response, we examine its wording — including cases where communication has been restricted. Even limited phrasing can indicate the nature of the data or the grounds relied upon by the source of data. We interpret these elements for our clients and assess whether the response warrants a request for correction or deletion.
Confidential and Independent Representation
All proceedings before the CCF are conducted under strict confidentiality. We act independently of any national authority and ensure that each case is managed with accuracy, discretion, and procedural integrity. Every representation is prepared personally and tailored to the client’s circumstances.
Contact Us
If you have received a response from the Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF) or believe that your personal data may be recorded in INTERPOL’s systems, early advice is essential. Requests for access and any subsequent steps — including analysis of the CCF’s wording or restrictions — require accuracy and familiarity with the organisation’s internal procedure. For a confidential consultation or to obtain an assessment of your situation, contact Otherside. All enquiries are treated in strict confidence.