Charlie Magri, in collaboration with Sandra Grossman from Grossman Young & Hammond, LLC, has co-authored an article that provides a detailed analysis of the most recent decision excerpts published by INTERPOL’s Commission for the Control of INTERPOL’s Files (CCF). These decisions, although heavily redacted, offer significant insights into the CCF’s handling of critical issues, such as due process violations, the misuse of INTERPOL’s channels, family-related cases, and stolen vehicle disputes.
One key case explored in the article involves a Yellow Notice related to international parental child abduction, where the CCF confirmed that even when a child’s location is partially known, the risk of international travel may justify maintaining the notice. Another notable case involves a Red Notice issued for issuing false value-added tax invoices. In this case, the CCF found that due to the lack of cooperation from the NCB and the applicant’s compelling evidence, the notice was deemed non-compliant with INTERPOL’s rules.
The article highlights these and other pivotal cases, providing practitioners and individuals with key takeaways for effectively addressing Red Notices and other INTERPOL notices. It underscores the importance of providing detailed legal arguments and emphasizes how non-cooperation from an NCB can influence the outcome of a case.
For more insights and a full breakdown of the recent CCF decisions, read the article on the GYH website via the link below:
